🔗 Share this article

Thhese days showcase a quite unusual occurrence: the inaugural US parade of the caretakers. Their attributes range in their qualifications and traits, but they all share the common mission – to avert an Israeli violation, or even demolition, of Gaza’s fragile ceasefire. After the war concluded, there have been few days without at least one of the former president's representatives on the ground. Only this past week featured the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all arriving to execute their duties.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In just a few short period it executed a set of operations in Gaza after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers – leading, based on accounts, in many of Palestinian casualties. Multiple officials demanded a renewal of the conflict, and the Knesset enacted a early decision to take over the occupied territories. The US reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in several ways, the Trump administration appears more concentrated on upholding the current, uneasy phase of the truce than on progressing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Regarding this, it looks the United States may have aspirations but little specific proposals.

At present, it remains unknown when the planned multinational oversight committee will actually take power, and the identical goes for the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the makeup of its members. On Tuesday, a US official declared the United States would not impose the composition of the foreign contingent on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish offer recently – what follows? There is also the contrary issue: which party will establish whether the units preferred by the Israelis are even interested in the task?

The issue of how long it will take to demilitarize Hamas is equally vague. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is going to now take the lead in disarming Hamas,” said the official lately. “That’s going to take a period.” Trump further reinforced the uncertainty, stating in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unnamed participants of this still unformed global force could deploy to Gaza while Hamas members still hold power. Are they dealing with a leadership or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the questions arising. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for everyday civilians in the present situation, with the group carrying on to focus on its own opponents and critics.

Current incidents have afresh underscored the gaps of Israeli reporting on both sides of the Gazan border. Every source attempts to examine all conceivable aspect of Hamas’s infractions of the ceasefire. And, typically, the reality that the organization has been stalling the return of the remains of deceased Israeli hostages has dominated the headlines.

Conversely, attention of non-combatant casualties in Gaza resulting from Israeli strikes has garnered minimal focus – if at all. Consider the Israeli response actions in the wake of a recent Rafah occurrence, in which two soldiers were lost. While Gaza’s authorities stated dozens of deaths, Israeli media pundits criticised the “moderate response,” which hit just facilities.

This is typical. During the past few days, Gaza’s media office charged Israeli forces of infringing the ceasefire with the group multiple times after the truce began, killing dozens of individuals and harming another 143. The claim was insignificant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was merely absent. That included information that eleven individuals of a Palestinian family were fatally shot by Israeli forces recently.

The rescue organization reported the family had been attempting to go back to their home in the Zeitoun area of the city when the transport they were in was attacked for allegedly going over the “boundary” that marks territories under Israeli army authority. That yellow line is invisible to the human eye and shows up just on maps and in government records – not always available to everyday people in the territory.

Yet that event barely received a mention in Israeli media. One source covered it in passing on its website, quoting an IDF spokesperson who explained that after a suspect transport was detected, troops fired warning shots towards it, “but the transport continued to advance on the troops in a way that posed an immediate danger to them. The soldiers shot to eliminate the risk, in compliance with the ceasefire.” No fatalities were claimed.

With this framing, it is little wonder a lot of Israelis think the group alone is to at fault for breaking the truce. This perception could lead to fuelling demands for a more aggressive strategy in Gaza.

Sooner or later – perhaps in the near future – it will no longer be enough for American representatives to take on the role of supervisors, advising the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need